Arizona Supreme Court· 6/8/1967
State v. Neil
Citations
- 428 P.2d 676
- 102 Ariz. 299
- 1967 Ariz. LEXIS 255
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that it was reversible error to comment on defendant’s record when no evidence of prior convictions had been admitted
- jury arguments may not be based on matters that were not and could not be received in evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bernstein, Lockwood, McFARLAND, Struckmeyer, Udall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BoltonArizona Supreme Court· 1995-06-13· cited 326×
- State v. MinceyArizona Supreme Court· 1981-10-13· cited 101×
- State v. DumaineArizona Supreme Court· 1989-11-07· cited 81×
- State v. WoodsArizona Supreme Court· 1984-04-17· cited 51×
- State v. SorensenArizona Supreme Court· 1969-06-13· cited 37×
- State v. BaileyArizona Supreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 21×
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-05-11· cited 10×
- State v. JordanArizona Supreme Court· 1969-12-19· cited 7×
- State v. PriceArizona Supreme Court· 1974-09-25· cited 3×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Thomas v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1958-06-30· cited 118×
- State v. ThomasArizona Supreme Court· 1954-10-18· cited 81×
- State v. EvansArizona Supreme Court· 1960-11-16· cited 77×
- State v. DowthardArizona Supreme Court· 1962-07-10· cited 52×
- State v. JordanArizona Supreme Court· 1956-03-13· cited 42×
- State v. GortarezArizona Supreme Court· 1965-06-10· cited 40×
- State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court· 1966-11-17· cited 35×
- State v. JacobsArizona Supreme Court· 1963-06-13· cited 33×
- State v. EddingtonArizona Supreme Court· 1963-10-23· cited 9×
- State v. FrancisArizona Supreme Court· 1963-11-13· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.