State v. Neiderer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing breadth of term \touch\ in the statute as a whole and drawing no distinction between touching underneath clothing and touching through clothing
• upholding trial court’s denial of bill of particulars where indictment alleged sexual assault had occurred over forty-four month period and did not give exact dates, because date of crimes was not an element
• “The State is barred from prosecuting the defendant for the same type of act during any part of the entire period alleged in the earlier indictments.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).