State v. Neave

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding defendant does not necessarily waive right to interpreter by failing to assert that right
• identifying those as the “three principal reasons why a non-English speaking criminal defendant needs an interpreter”
• discussing the distinction between waivers asserted by counsel and by the defendant personally
• right to interpreter waivable only by defendant personally, and not by defendant's attorney
• waiver of right to interpreter must be made personally by accused
• discussing obligation to provide criminal defendant with interpreter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).