State v. Neal
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 584
Syllabus
OVI – CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE – SUFFICIENCY – MANIFEST WEIGHT The state presented sufficient circumstantial evidence to sustain defendant's convictions for OVI, failure to maintain reasonable control, and refusing an OVI test, where a witness saw defendant in the driver's seat of a wrecked car after hearing a crash mere minutes before, notwithstanding two occupants of the vehicle exiting from the car. Defendant's convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the trial court found the car's two occupants' testimony to be incredible.
Judges: Bergeron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
- State v. Walker (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-12-23· cited 255×
- State v. Shabazz (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-17· cited 35×
- State v. HamOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-22· cited 31×
- State v. RobinsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-05· cited 31×
- State v. EllisonOhio Court of Appeals· 2008-10-10· cited 30×
- State v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-22· cited 16×
- State v. ArmsteadOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-11-10· cited 12×
- State v. AnthonyOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-09· cited 6×
- State v. BlountOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-30· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.