Ohio Court of Appeals· 4/24/2017
State v. Neal
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 1493
Syllabus
Appellant's conviction for gross sexual imposition and sexual imposition was affirmed, as the evidence was supported by the manifest weight of the evidence, the evidence presented to the jury was permissible under the evidence rules, and there was no prosecutorial misconduct during closing arguments.
Judges: Ringland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. ElmoreOhio Supreme Court· 2006-12-13· cited 212×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-01-22· cited 192×
- State v. MuttartOhio Supreme Court· 2007-10-11· cited 163×
- State v. MorganOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-09· cited 118×
- State v. ClarkeOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-10-03· cited 49×
- State v. WrightOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-03-17· cited 28×
- State v. DoughertyOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-10-27· cited 14×
- State v. DehnerOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-08-19· cited 12×
- State v. SeelenbinderOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-02-04· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.