Skip to main content

State v. Neal

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 2499

Syllabus

MOTION TO WITHDRAW PLEA: The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's presentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea where: (1) defendant was represented by competent counsel when he entered the plea; (2) defendant was afforded a complete Crim.R. 11 plea colloquy; (3) defendant failed to include specific reasons for withdrawing his plea; and (4) the record does not demonstrate that defendant did not understand the charges and possible penalties he was facing or had a complete defense to the charge.

Judges: Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.