State v. Neal
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 2499
Syllabus
MOTION TO WITHDRAW PLEA: The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's presentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea where: (1) defendant was represented by competent counsel when he entered the plea; (2) defendant was afforded a complete Crim.R. 11 plea colloquy; (3) defendant failed to include specific reasons for withdrawing his plea; and (4) the record does not demonstrate that defendant did not understand the charges and possible penalties he was facing or had a complete defense to the charge.
Judges: Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.