Skip to main content
· 4/15/2024

State v. Ndubueze

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 1414

Syllabus

Appellant's convictions for rape and gross sexual imposition are supported by sufficient evidence and are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The jury was in the best position to judge the credibility of the witnesses.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a district court acts within its discretion to deny leave to 13 amend when amendment would be futile
  • holding that the district court abused its discretion in denying an ERISA plaintiff leave to amend because “amendment would allow [the plaintiff] to state a legally cognizable claim for breach of fiduciary duty”
  • explaining that “[a] district court acts within its discretion to deny leave to amend when amendment would be futile”
  • explaining that a 9 district court may deny leave to amend when amendment would be futile
  • explaining that a district court may deny leave to amend when 5 amendment would be futile
  • explaining that a 10 district court may deny leave to amend when amendment would be futile

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Piper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.