State v. Nalls
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 3168
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in denying appellant's pro se amended petition for postconviction relief based on untimeliness. The trial court also did not err in overruling motions for voluntary recusal, to consolidate the present case with an unrelated 1989 rape case, for summary judgment on the untimely petition for postconviction relief, and for judicial notice related to the untimely petition. The trial court did err, however, in overruling without explanation appellant's two motions to vacate court costs. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Braden (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2019-10-16· cited 40×
- State v. CurrentOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-10· cited 28×
- State v. DeVaughnsOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-10· cited 11×
- State v. PriceOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-25· cited 3×
- State v. SibrianOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-18· cited 2×
- State v. NallsOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-06-16· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.