State v. Myren

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the harmless error analysis is substantively the same as the test for prejudice in the ineffective assistance of counsel context
• rejecting the argument that virtually no cross-examination is per se an unusual circumstance warranting exclusion of the preliminary hearing testimony
• confrontation clause is satisfied by the opportunity for cross-examination
• confrontation clause is satisfied by the opportunity for cross-examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).