State v. Muzzy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• victim’s statements that the defendant was “playing with himself’ or “playing with his thing” was sufficient to corroborate that the harm specified in the crime as charged — witnessing an act of sexual conduct — had in fact occurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Simons
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-09-05· cited 17×
• State v. Porter
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-11-16· cited 10×
• State v. Panduro
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-12-03· cited 9×
• State v. Caldwell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-29· cited 6×
• State v. Kelley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-12-01· cited 6×
• State v. OFODRINWA
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-03-02· cited 5×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Johns
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-08-26· cited 242×
• Roger Matthew Walters v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-01-24· cited 169×
• State v. Thompson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1999-02-04· cited 139×
• State v. Lerch
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-02-08· cited 87×
• State v. Reinhart
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1895-01-14· cited 87×
• State v. Pratt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-01-11· cited 78×
• State v. Walters
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-01-17· cited 66×
• State v. Howard
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1921-12-27· cited 39×
• State v. Manzella
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-07-26· cited 22×
• State v. Rinkin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-05-29· cited 21×
• State v. Fry
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-03-20· cited 19×
• State v. McJunkin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-11-15· cited 15×
• State v. Wilhelm
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-06-21· cited 12×
• State v. Walters
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-12-06· cited 9×
• State v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-09-12· cited 5×