Ohio Court of Appeals· 12/20/2019
State v. Musser
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 5271
Syllabus
We cannot conclude that appellant's 30-month prison sentence is contrary to law or that there is clear and convincing evidence that the record does not support the sentence. The record establishes that the trial court correctly found that the presumption in favor of a prison term for a felony drug offense was not rebutted pursuant to R.C. 2929.13(D)(1) and (2). Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Donovan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. MathisOhio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 1,010×
- State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-17· cited 175×
- State v. RodefferOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-27· cited 137×
- State v. LeopardOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-05· cited 135×
- State v. ArmstrongOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-05· cited 22×
- State v. MurnahanOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-11-30· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.