Skip to main content
· 6/21/1983

State v. Musselman

Citations

  • 667 P.2d 1061
  • 1983 Utah LEXIS 1081

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “in civil cases, it is for the client to decide whether he will accept a settlement offer” (quoting ABA Model Code op Professional Responsibili ty EC 7-7 (1981)
  • disallowing appeal as “dismissal” where ruling was clearly based on the trial court’s assessment of the evidence and was therefore an acquittal
  • discussing appeals from dismissals and concluding that a dismissal based on the court’s construction of the applicable law before the court ruled on the sufficiency of the evidence to convict was, in effect, a final judgment of dismissal and therefore appealable
  • \A ruling that constitutes a factual resolution in favor of the defendant on one or more of the elements of the offense charged is an acquittal.\
  • \A ruling that constitutes a factual resolution in favor of the defendant on one or more of the elements of the offense charged is an acquittal.\
  • jeopardy attaches when first witness is sworn and court begins to take evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Hall, Oaks, Howe, Dee, Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.