Court of Appeals of Maryland· 3/3/1966
State v. Musgrove
Citations
- 217 A.2d 247
- 241 Md. 521
- 1966 Md. LEXIS 739
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ob-serving distinction between Rule 422 and other discovery rules
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hornby
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McNeil v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionSupreme Court· 1972-06-19· cited 180×
- Gluckstern v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-06-07· cited 88×
- Tippett v. MarylandFourth Circuit· 1971-01-04· cited 75×
- Director, Patuxent Institution v. CashCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1973-06-14· cited 50×
- Moss v. DirectorCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-03-02· cited 38×
- Sas v. State of MarylandD. Maryland· 1969-01-15· cited 30×
- Unnamed caseFourth Circuit· 1971-01-04· cited 29×
- State v. JonesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1973-06-01· cited 28×
- Williams & Fulwood v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-11-07· cited 26×
- Wise v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-06-21· cited 18×
- Tanner v. HardyFourth Circuit· 1985-06-21· cited 17×
- Wyatt v. JohnsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-02-07· cited 13×
- Savage v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1973-08-20· cited 11×
- Hudson v. Superintendent, Anne Arundel County Detention CenterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-02-11· cited 11×
- Mullen v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1969-02-18· cited 10×
- Weeder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-05-07· cited 9×
- Knox v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-08-25· cited 9×
- Marsh v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1974-07-19· cited 8×
- Smith v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-07-25· cited 6×
- Martin v. DirectorCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1973-08-03· cited 5×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Kardy v. SHOOK, J.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-02-15· cited 67×
- Brady v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1960-05-19· cited 45×
- State v. MurdockCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-05-29· cited 26×
- Palmer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1957-12-19· cited 22×
- Hamilton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1961-05-08· cited 20×
- Simmons v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1963-04-04· cited 14×
- Myers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-09-12· cited 13×
- Myers v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1958-10-23· cited 11×
- Cowman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1959-06-08· cited 9×
- Cumberland v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1961-06-19· cited 5×
- Barnes v. DirectorCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-08-05· cited 4×
Other cases named State v. Musgrove
12 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- State v. MusgroveMontana Supreme Court· 1978-08-10· cited 28×
- State v. MusgroveCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-12-01· cited 18×
- State v. MusgroveCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1966-01-25· cited 13×
- State v. MusgroveLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2000-12-15· cited 11×
- State v. MusgroveMontana Supreme Court· 1980-04-23· cited 8×
- State v. MusgroveMontana Supreme Court· 1983-02-24· cited 4×
- State v. MusgroveCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1966-04-04· cited 2×
- State v. MusgroveMontana Supreme Court· 1982-12-29· cited 1×
- State v. MusgroveMontana Supreme Court· 1982-12-29
- State v. MusgroveMontana Supreme Court· 1983-02-24
- State v. MusgroveCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-02-08
- State v. MusgroveMissouri Court of Appeals· 1998-05-26
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.