Skip to main content

State v. Murray

Citations

  • 469 S.W.3d 921
  • 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 939
  • 2015 WL 5444483

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • it was sufficient that the defendant simply \knew that a jury had to be selected\
  • The defendant did not explicitly state that he understood or was familiar with objection procedure; rather, he indicated that he had a notion of a strategy for when (or when not to
  • both citing Faretta, 422 U.S. at 814

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cohen, Odenwald, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.