State v. Murray
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 45
Syllabus
The officer had a reasonable, articulable suspicion that appellant had been driving while impaired and was justified in administering the horizontal gaze nystagmus (HGN) field sobriety test. The officer administered the HGN test in substantial compliance with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration standards. The totality of circumstances, including the HGN test result, established probable cause to arrest appellant for operating a vehicle while under the influence. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- City of Dayton v. EricksonOhio Supreme Court· 1996-07-03· cited 850×
- Ohio v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court· 1980-12-30· cited 666×
- State v. MaysOhio Supreme Court· 2008-09-16· cited 383×
- State v. Belton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-04-20· cited 156×
- State v. SantiagoOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-10-14· cited 25×
- State v. LennonOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-05-11· cited 12×
- State v. TynerOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-27· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.