Skip to main content

State v. Murray

Citations

  • 416 P.3d 1225
  • 190 Wash. 2d 727

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the argument that indecent exposure is “inherently sexual in nature” and concluding that “[n]othing in the statute or these definitions inherently requires that an exposure be committed with a sexual motive” (emphasis in original)
  • “Indecent exposure is not one of the crimes defined as a sex offense.” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wiggins, Madsen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.