Skip to main content

State v. Murray

Citations

  • 617 A.2d 135
  • 159 Vt. 198
  • 1992 Vt. LEXIS 137

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that ambiguous agreements are strictly construed against State
  • resolving ambiguity in deferred sentence agreement, like all probation agreements, against the State
  • “A deferred-sentence agreement, like all probation agreements, is a form of contract, subject to the normal rules for construction of contracts.” (citation omitted)
  • general language of probation agreement insufficient to allow court to extend the duration of defendant's probation where specific term of probation agreement provided a limited probation period
  • general language of probation agreement insufficient to allow court to extend the duration of defedant’s probation where specific term of probation agreement provided a limited probation period
  • “A deferred-sentence agreement, like all probation agreements, is a form of contract, subject to the normal rules for construction of contracts.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Gibson, Dooley, Morse, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.