State v. Murphy Motors, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Court remanded for Board to obtain examination describing relationship among various psychiatric disorders so as to allow proper determination of disability rating
• where, on veteran’s claim for increase in 30% rating, BVA had awarded a 50% rating, remand was required for Board to consider and discuss entitlement to 70% and 100% ratings provided in VA rating schedule
• Board erred in not explaining why higher rating category not chosen
• Board’s failure to consider IU required remand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).