Supreme Court of New Jersey· 11/20/1961
State v. Murphy
Citations
- 175 A.2d 622
- 36 N.J. 172
- 1961 N.J. LEXIS 253
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[Although the State may, as it necessarily must, diffuse its total power among many offices and agencies, yet when the State brings its authority to bear upon one accused of crime, all of its agents must respond to satisfy the State’s obligation to the accused.”
- “[A]lthough the State may, as it necessarily must, diffuse its total power among many offices and agencies, yet when the State brings its authority to bear upon one accused of crime, all of its agents must respond to satisfy the State’s obligation to the accused.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: WBiisrTEAUB
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ClawansSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1962-07-03· cited 138×
- United States v. KahanerS.D. New York· 1962-02-16· cited 121×
- State v. LaganellaNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1976-08-18· cited 68×
- State v. Habeeb Robinson(078900) (Essex County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2017-05-10· cited 66×
- Ballinger v. Delaware River Port AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey· 2002-06-25· cited 50×
- State v. WashingtonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2018-02-16· cited 28×
- State v. CookSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1965-01-13· cited 26×
- State v. MoffaSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1961-12-05· cited 25×
- Port of New York Authority v. Hackensack Water Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1963-11-06· cited 22×
- State, in Interest of WcSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-02-26· cited 20×
- American Budget Corp. v. FurmanSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1961-11-20· cited 12×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1966-09-20· cited 12×
- De Rose v. ByrneNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1975-07-07· cited 10×
- State v. TullNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1989-01-10· cited 5×
- Teamsters Local No. 676 v. PORT AUTH. TRANSITNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1970-01-28· cited 4×
- State v. BarathNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1979-04-06· cited 4×
- Interstate Wreck. Co. v. Palisades Interstate Pk. Comm.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1971-01-25· cited 4×
- State v. DolceNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1963-02-14· cited 2×
- State v. WallsSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-02-26· cited 2×
- State v. D.R.H.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-12-20· cited 2×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-03· cited 1,195×
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court· 1953-03-09· cited 873×
- United States Ex Rel. Touhy v. RagenSupreme Court· 1951-02-26· cited 526×
- Petty v. Tennessee-Missouri Bridge CommissionSupreme Court· 1959-04-20· cited 390×
- Bowman Dairy Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1951-04-30· cited 356×
- Boske v. ComingoreSupreme Court· 1900-04-23· cited 295×
- Helvering v. GerhardtSupreme Court· 1938-05-23· cited 274×
- Hinderlider v. La Plata River & Cherry Creek Ditch Co.Supreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 175×
- West Virginia Ex Rel. Dyer v. SimsSupreme Court· 1951-04-09· cited 166×
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Raymond A. O'COnnOrSecond Circuit· 1956-10-01· cited 97×
- Howell v. Port of New York AuthorityD. New Jersey· 1940-08-28· cited 20×
- Miller v. Port of New York AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1939-11-20· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.