State v. Murcia-Linarez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• sanctioning an attorney for filing protected information in a different case under seal
• sanctioning plaintiffs attorney pursuant to RCFC 16(f) for violating the court’s protective order
• finding an award of expenses under Rule 16(f) was appropriate where sanctioned party did not act in bad faith but nonetheless violated a court order 19 based on an unreasonable interpretation of that order
• “The ability to schedule and control pretrial proceedings would mean very little if the court did not have the power to enforce its orders”
• awarding attorneys’ fees for a violation of a protective order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).