Skip to main content
· 4/23/1992

State v. Muratella

Citations

  • 483 N.W.2d 128
  • 240 Neb. 567
  • 1992 Neb. LEXIS 133

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Being confined to one’s home, subject to electronic monitoring, with the freedom to engage in employment and probation-related activities, is far less onerous than being imprisoned.”
  • “home detention on probation, subject to electronic monitoring, is insufficiently restrictive to constitute ‘custody’ for purposes of granting sentencing credit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hastings, Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, Fahrnbruch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.