State v. Munoz
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 1896
Syllabus
Probation violation ineffective assistance of counsel App.R. 16(A)(7). Trial counsel was not ineffective for stipulating that appellant had violated the terms of his community-control sanctions after he was found guilty of gross sexual imposition and child endangering in a separate case appellate court did not consider appellant's assignment of error that the trial court erred in finding he had violated the terms of his community-control sanctions where appellant did not cite to any record evidence or make any legal argument supporting his claimed error, as required by App.R. 16(A)(7).
Judges: Keough
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. DrummondOhio Supreme Court· 2006-10-18· cited 390×
- State v. CopelandOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-04-14· cited 8×
- State v. HoustonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-21· cited 4×
- State v. ReeseOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-01· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.