Skip to main content

State v. Munoz

Citations

  • 2006 NMSC 5
  • 139 N.M. 106
  • 2006 NMSC 005
  • 129 P.3d 142

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, “[s]ince the phrase protracted period of time is 6 self-explanatory and has an understandable and common meaning, there was no need 7 for further definition” (emphasis omitted)
  • concluding that the district court did not err by failing to instruct 8 the jury regarding the meaning of “protracted period of time” because the term “is 9 self-explanatory and has an understandable and common meaning”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maes, Bosson, Minzner, Serna, Chávez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.