State v. Mumford
Citations
- 70 Kan. 858
- 79 P. 669
- 1905 Kan. LEXIS 61
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Grand Larceny — Sufficient Description of Property. An information for grand larceny that charges the defendant with stealing “one head of neat cattle, to wit, a steer about three , years old, a more particular description of which the informant is not now able to give,” is sufficiently definite.</p> <p>2. --— Evidence Sufficient. The evidence examined and reviewed, and held to be sufficient to sustain a conviction of grand larceny.</p>
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.