Skip to main content

State v. Mumford

Citations

  • 70 Kan. 858
  • 79 P. 669
  • 1905 Kan. LEXIS 61

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Grand Larceny — Sufficient Description of Property. An information for grand larceny that charges the defendant with stealing “one head of neat cattle, to wit, a steer about three , years old, a more particular description of which the informant is not now able to give,” is sufficiently definite.</p> <p>2. --— Evidence Sufficient. The evidence examined and reviewed, and held to be sufficient to sustain a conviction of grand larceny.</p>

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.