State v. Mumford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e must assume that the jury followed the instructions of the court and responded to the merits of the case based upon its view of the evidence.”
• approving of these two options
• approving of these two options
• approving of these two options

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Teeters
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1992-07-22· cited 29×
• State of Iowa v. Marshaun Jordan Merrett
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2014-01-17· cited 27×
• State v. Thap Hy
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 1990-04-24· cited 11×
• State v. Phanhsouvanh
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1992-12-23· cited 8×
• State of Iowa v. Emmanuel Zleh Totaye, Jr.
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2024-07-24
• State of Iowa v. Douglas Raymond Spurgeon
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2024-08-21
• State of Iowa v. Candelario Leon
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2025-02-19

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Green v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1957-12-16· cited 3,075×
• United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.
  Supreme Court· 1977-04-04· cited 1,460×
• Berghammer v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1971-03-11· cited 58×
• State v. Morelock
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1969-02-11· cited 31×
• Phillips Chemical Company v. C. E. Hulbert, Jr.
  Fifth Circuit· 1962-06-05· cited 18×
• State v. Hurley
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1971-04-22· cited 14×
• State v. Wedner
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1979-09-24· cited 11×
• State v. Propps
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1971-09-27· cited 4×