State v. Mulvaney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “An amendment is generally permissible ... when it ‘merely clarifies some detail of the existing charge and could not reasonably have caused the defendant any prejudice.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Holland v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-02-03· cited 2×
• Hart v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-11-07

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Bloom
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-11-06· cited 83×
• State v. Anderson
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1989-01-26· cited 72×
• Rose v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-04-09· cited 22×
• State v. Stell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-12-23· cited 22×
• Green v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-24· cited 21×
• State v. Belton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-05-09· cited 13×
• Peevey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-07-03· cited 9×
• Wright v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-07-13· cited 7×
• Henderson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-20· cited 3×