State v. Mullenburg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a mistrial was required because the prosecutor told the jury that the defendant had refused to say anything to a police officer following her arrest
• “The dispositive question on this issue, therefore, is whether the purportedly curative instruction was sufficient to unring the bell.”
• “A defendant’s reason for exercising her right to remain silent is irrelevant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).