State v. Mullen Trucking 2005, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion for review of a decision in which the special master found that an appropriate time for the hepatitis B vaccine to cause seizures was 30 days
• finding new argument that petitioner had proven causation based on statements in the Special Master’s decision was waived when the specific argument had not been asserted before the Special Master
• defining challenge-rechallenge as “when a person (1) is exposed to one antigen, (2) reacts to that antigen in a particular way, (3) is given the same antigen again, and (4) reacts to that antigen similarly”
• defining challenge-rechallenge as “when a person (1) is exposed to one antigen, (2) reacts to that antigen in a particular way, (3) is given the same antigen again, and (4) reacts to that antigen similarly”
• defining challenge-rechallenge as “when a person (1) is exposed to one antigen, (2) reacts to that antigen in a particular way, (3) is given the same antigen again, and (4) reacts to that antigen similarly”
• defining challenge-rechallenge as “when a person (1) is exposed to one antigen, (2) reacts to that antigen in a particular way, (3) is given the same antigen again, and (4) reacts to that antigen similarly”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).