State v. Mulkey
Citations
- 6 Idaho 617
- 59 P. 17
- 1899 Ida. LEXIS 47
Syllabus
<p>Act to Prohibiting Gambling Construed. — The act of February 6, 1899, known as the anti-gambling act, held valid. When the defendant in a criminal action attacks certain sections of an act as violative of the constitution, and it does not appear from the record that any of his rights affected by said sections were involved on the trial, or by the judgment, there remaining (should the sections so attacked be eliminated) sufficient to constitute a valid act that supports the judgment, the court will not pass on the validity of the sections so attacked.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the court.)</p>
Judges: Huston, Quarles, Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CarringerIdaho Supreme Court· 1974-06-20· cited 36×
- Gillesby v. Board of County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court· 1910-01-25· cited 32×
- Worthen v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1974-08-06· cited 27×
- Mills Novelty Co. v. DunbarIdaho Supreme Court· 1906-01-06· cited 18×
- State v. WitzelIdaho Supreme Court· 1957-07-01· cited 7×
- In re RowlandIdaho Supreme Court· 1902-11-14· cited 7×
- In re BurgessIdaho Supreme Court· 1906-03-02· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.