State v. Mueller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It follows that the impression, imprint or likeness must be sufficiently discernible that the factfinder can say that it purports to be a seal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Panko
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-03-21· cited 14×
• State v. Amoroso
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-12-11· cited 5×
• State v. McKay
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-07-26· cited 3×
• State v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-09-05· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hoare
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1975-02-24· cited 46×
• State v. Caruso
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1980-06-24· cited 25×