State v. Moyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a scar one to one and one-quarter inches long and one-eighth of an inch wide “located * * * in an area normally covered by clothing” did not consti- tute a “serious and protracted disfigurement” under ORS 161.015

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lambert v. Palmateer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-05-15· cited 17×
• State v. Stone
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-06-07· cited 14×
• State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Moyer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-10-22· cited 9×
• State v. Van Nguyen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-08-20· cited 9×
• State v. Drew
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-02-12· cited 5×
• State v. Fields
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-06-17· cited 4×
• State v. Ramirez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-05-20· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hockings
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-04-11· cited 53×
• State v. Nulph
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-12-12· cited 27×
• State v. Swaggerty
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-11-13· cited 15×
• State v. Dazhan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-11-13· cited 11×
• State v. Templeton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1975-10-13· cited 1×