State v. Mounkes
Citations
- 88 Kan. 193
- 127 P. 637
- 1912 Kan. LEXIS 35
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Criminal Law—Homicide in Defense of Third Party. Whether one may defend another from death or great bodily harm does not depend upon the reality or imminence of the danger nor upon the belief, as to these facts, of the one supposed to be in peril, but depends upon the facts as they reasonably and actually appear to the defender.</p> <p>2. Justifiable Homicide — Common-law Rule. By the provisions of section 11 of the crimes act (Gen. Stat. 1909, § 2499) the common-law rule is ingrafted into the statute; and upon a charge of murder or manslaughter the accused must, on trial, be acquitted if the alleged homicide was committed under circumstances or in a case where, by the common law, such homicide was justifiable or excusable.</p> <p>3. - Same. Under the common law one may, without incurring criminal liability, take life if necessary to prevent the murder of, or other atrocious felony against, his brother. Justification for an assault with intent to kill can not require more than when death results.</p>
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Leeper v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1979-01-19· cited 49×
- State v. ChiarelloNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1961-10-16· cited 36×
- Duckett v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1998-09-04· cited 26×
- People v. YoungNew York Court of Appeals· 1962-05-10· cited 19×
- State v. MounkesSupreme Court of Kansas· 1914-02-07· cited 9×
- People v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1961-02-14· cited 1×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.