State v. Moten

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a sentence which may have been improperly enhanced because the sale of the controlled substance was within 200 feet of a public housing facility is not an illegal sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-12· cited 15×
• Cook v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-09-24· cited 4×
• Chesson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-17· cited 2×
• Peterson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-03· cited 2×
• Anderson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-04-12· cited 2×
• Snow v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-21· cited 1×
• Steinberg v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-04-10
• Lefils v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-11-12

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Davis v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-07-20· cited 248×
• State v. Callaway
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-07-20· cited 219×
• Judge v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-03-20· cited 145×
• Brown v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-01-06· cited 69×
• Sanders v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-05-28· cited 26×
• State v. Spella
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-10-11· cited 24×
• Paige v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-08-12· cited 9×