State v. Moss

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court considered the prejudice to the defendant and whether alternate sanctions to exclusion would suffice
• trial court considered the prejudice to the defendant and whether alternate sanctions to exclusion would suffice
• where exclusion is the only meaningful sanction available, it is not an abuse of discretion to exclude a defense witness
• trial court “expressly, and in detail, considered alternatives to exclusion and concluded for reasons stated that the sanction of exclusion was the only meaningful sanction available on the facts of this case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Wesley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-06-22· cited 9×
• State v. Divito
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-02-25· cited 5×
• A. G. v. Guitron
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-10-27· cited 4×
• State v. Biggs
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-02-28· cited 3×
• State v. Wyatt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-07-15· cited 2×
• State v. Wiese
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-04-22