State v. Moss

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the intent to use scissors as a weapon “if their use became necessary” was sufficient to sustain a conviction for aggravated robbery
• intent to use scissors as a weapon “if their use became necessary” was sufficient to sustain conviction for armed robbery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Trott
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-09-16· cited 145×
• State v. Slaughter
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-01-27· cited 36×
• LaMere v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-04-13· cited 34×
• State v. Plantin
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-07-13· cited 20×
• State v. Patton
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-11-03· cited 10×
• State v. Cepeda
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-01-26· cited 3×
• United States v. Townsend
  D. Minnesota· 2016-12-19· cited 2×
• Rochester City Lines Co. v. City of Rochester
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2018-06-20· cited 2×
• State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Mervel George Jones, III, Appellant
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2025-10-13

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-07-14· cited 33×