Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2/3/1989
State v. Mosburg
Citations
- 768 P.2d 313
- 13 Kan. App. 2d 257
- 1989 Kan. App. LEXIS 54
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that a condition of probation mandating that probationer refrain from becoming pregnant was unconstitutional
- holding unconstitutional a condition of probation requiring a probationer to refrain from becoming pregnant
- finding tide probation condition ordering the defendant to refrain from becoming pregnant should be stricken because it unduly intruded upon her right to privacy
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brazil, Benson, Woleslagel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. ZaringCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1992-07-22· cited 75×
- State v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-01-30· cited 71×
- State v. OakleyWisconsin Supreme Court· 2001-07-10· cited 37×
- People v. NegreteAppellate Court of Illinois· 1994-02-03· cited 11×
- Trammell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-06-18· cited 6×
- State v. WalbridgeCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1990-06-22· cited 3×
- State of Iowa v. Stephanie Marie FatlandCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2016-05-11· cited 3×
- State v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2008-06-13· cited 2×
- In re K.B.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2012-09-14· cited 2×
- State v. CalhounCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2000-03-03· cited 1×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court· 1972-03-22· cited 1,851×
- Carey v. Population Services InternationalSupreme Court· 1977-06-09· cited 1,185×
- United States v. Virginia Consuelo-GonzalezNinth Circuit· 1975-04-15· cited 247×
- Stayton v. StaytonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1973-03-03· cited 100×
- Rodriguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-10-31· cited 98×
- State v. BucknerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1977-11-22· cited 62×
- Arthur J. Porth v. The Hon. George Templar and the United States of America, United States of America v. Arthur J. PorthTenth Circuit· 1971-12-03· cited 60×
- People v. PointerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-02-17· cited 48×
- State v. GoeringSupreme Court of Kansas· 1979-05-05· cited 35×
- State v. StarbuckSupreme Court of Kansas· 1986-03-28· cited 20×
- Wiggins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-07-23· cited 15×
- State v. HargisCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1980-12-31· cited 10×
- State v. LinsinCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1985-11-27· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.