State v. Mortensen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The same questions now presented having been before this court on the former appeal, and having been considered and decided on that occasion under facts of the same character, they must now be regarded as res judicata.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Francis v. National DME
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2015-05-07· cited 16×
• State v. Baker
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2008-01-10· cited 5×
• State v. Mewhinney
  Utah Supreme Court· 1914-03-06

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cromwell v. County of Sac
  Supreme Court· 1877-04-16· cited 2,216×
• Mattingly v. Pennie
  California Supreme Court· 1895-01-05· cited 92×
• State v. Mortensen
  Utah Supreme Court· 1903-08-12· cited 73×
• State v. King
  Utah Supreme Court· 1902-03-28· cited 39×
• State v. Morgan
  Utah Supreme Court· 1901-02-02· cited 29×
• Herriman Irrigation Co. v. Keel
  Utah Supreme Court· 1902-07-19· cited 29×
• People v. Murray
  California Supreme Court· 1892-03-31· cited 4×
• People v. Dowdigan
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1887-10-06· cited 4×
• State v. King
  Utah Supreme Court· 1903-10-22· cited 4×