Ohio Court of Appeals· 1/31/2020

State v. Morgan

Citations

2020 Ohio 292

Syllabus

Because the state did not act in bad faith, the trial court did not err in allowing photographic evidence to be used in lieu of the destroyed, potentially useful, physical evidence. The court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the admission of other acts evidence. Evid.R. 404 no contest prejudice.

Judges: Pietrykowski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Blakemore v. Blakemore
Ohio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
California v. Trombetta
Supreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
Arizona v. Youngblood
Supreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 3,366×
State v. Issa
Ohio Supreme Court· 2001-08-29· cited 787×
State v. Conway
Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-06-21· cited 704×
State v. Powell
Ohio Supreme Court· 2012-06-13· cited 423×
State v. Thompson
Ohio Supreme Court· 1981-06-24· cited 109×
State v. Geeslin
Ohio Supreme Court· 2007-10-11· cited 89×
In re J.B.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-03· cited 3×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.