Skip to main content

State v. Moreno

Citations

  • 294 S.W.3d 594
  • 2009 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1306
  • 2009 WL 3013577

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that, in jury trial case, that trial court’s directed verdict triggered double jeopardy protections
  • holding that trial court’s grant of defendant’s motion for directed verdict before State rested case-in-chief constituted acquittal for double jeopardy purposes
  • explaining that court is not bound by trial judge's label when categorizing an order, but must instead \examine the substance of the order\
  • observing that “jeopardy must have attached initially” before double jeopardy protections are implicated
  • stating that “jeopardy must have attached initially[]” before double-jeopardy protections are implicated.
  • observing that “jeopardy must have attached initially” before double-jeopardy protections are implicated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keasler, Keller, Meyers, Price, Womack, Johnson, Hervey, Cochran, Holcomb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.