State v. Moore

Citations

• 2022 Ohio 3460

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in its analysis of the sentencing factors set forth in R.C. 2929.11 and R.C. 2929.12 thus, appellant cannot demonstrate that his sentence was clearly and convincingly contrary to law. The trial court also did not err when it imposed consecutive sentences, because appellant's history of criminal conduct demonstrated that consecutive sentences were necessary to protect the public from future crime by him. Judgments affirmed.