State v. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• opining, in dicta, that defendant’s declaration the motion was “true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief” did not meet the rule’s requirement of a sworn motion and the defendant should have been required to attest to its truth, unqualifiedly

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Socarras
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-01-20· cited 3×
• Taylor v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-08-28
• City of Pompano Beach v. Twomey
  Florida Circuit Courts· 1986-08-08
• State v. Comstock
  Florida Circuit Courts· 1989-08-22
• State v. Morales
  Florida Circuit Courts· 1990-05-16

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Upton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-01-28· cited 60×
• United States v. Jose Medina-Arellano
  Fifth Circuit· 1978-03-13· cited 34×
• State v. Newman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-01-31· cited 9×
• Kassel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-04-30· cited 4×