State v. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting the rule from Leavitt and recognizing a due process claim “under the circumstances where the court has misled the defendant into believing that his conduct was not prohibited”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Minor
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-01-17· cited 24×
• State v. Carter
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-05-26· cited 21×
• State v. Breitung
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2010-04-20· cited 12×
• State v. Moore
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-06-03· cited 10×
• State Of Washington v. Bryant Jieta
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2020-02-10· cited 8×
• State v. Minor
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2006-06-27· cited 4×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Rohrich
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-06-19· cited 387×
• State v. Blackwell
  Washington Supreme Court· 1993-02-18· cited 260×
• State v. Michielli
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-05-29· cited 257×
• State v. Wilson
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-03-13· cited 70×
• State v. Jeffrey
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-03-09· cited 47×
• State v. Leavitt
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-07-20· cited 32×