Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/31/2021
State v. Moore
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 1067
Syllabus
Appellant's motion to suppress was properly denied by the trial court, where the warrantless search of appellant's automobile was justified under the automobile exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement. Appellant's possession and trafficking convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence.
Judges: Zmuda
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 7,197×
- United States v. RossSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,985×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- State v. WessonOhio Supreme Court· 2013-10-23· cited 129×
- City of Athens v. WolfOhio Supreme Court· 1974-06-19· cited 68×
- State v. DavenportOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-24· cited 24×
- State v. PurdyOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-09-23· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.