State v. Moore

Citations

• 2020 Ohio 3395

Syllabus

No prejudice resulted from state's isolated remark about appellant's assertion of right to silence. Identity evidence was not insufficient even though child victim was unable to identify appellant in court. Crim.R. 16(K) not violated where experts offered opinions to counter defense theory first revealed during opening statement opinions were admissible even if stated as possibilities. Counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to booking photo taken at arrest for crime being tried.