Skip to main content

State v. Moore

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 4778

Syllabus

Crim.R. 29/Sufficiency prosecutorial misconduct. Appellant removed the victim's money from her wallet without her permission and returned it only after the victim fought with appellant. Sufficient evidence was submitted that appellant's actions constituted theft. Appellant failed to show that but for the prosecutor's statements made during closing argument the outcome of the trial would have been different. Appeal as to maximum sentence is moot because appellant is only challenging length of his sentence and he has completed his sentence.

Judges: Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.