State v. Moore
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 4778
Syllabus
Crim.R. 29/Sufficiency prosecutorial misconduct. Appellant removed the victim's money from her wallet without her permission and returned it only after the victim fought with appellant. Sufficient evidence was submitted that appellant's actions constituted theft. Appellant failed to show that but for the prosecutor's statements made during closing argument the outcome of the trial would have been different. Appeal as to maximum sentence is moot because appellant is only challenging length of his sentence and he has completed his sentence.
Judges: Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 3,922×
- State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court· 2001-06-06· cited 807×
- State v. MorelandOhio Supreme Court· 1990-04-04· cited 702×
- State v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court· 1998-05-20· cited 293×
- State v. Walker (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-12-23· cited 255×
- State v. GapenOhio Supreme Court· 2004-12-15· cited 186×
- State v. CampbellOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-05-22· cited 27×
- State v. LarryOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-02· cited 20×
- State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County· 2018-06-07· cited 14×
- State v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-03-06· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.