State v. . Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a particular short-form indictment would be invalid at common law because “it [did] not charge the means whereby the prisoner slew the deceased, nor the manner of the slaying”
• arguing strongly that statements of existing state of mind should be admitted even when made by accused after commission of crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Exum.
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 1905-03-21· cited 108×
• State v. . Arnold
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 1890-09-05· cited 36×
• State v. . Brown
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 1890-02-05· cited 4×
• Bradley v. Claudon
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1892-12-12· cited 4×
• State v. Singleton
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2024-05-23

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. King
  California Supreme Court· 1865-07-01· cited 84×
• People v. Davis
  California Supreme Court· 1887-09-10· cited 29×