State v. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that ORS 137.101 “does not itself authorize a court to impose a fine, compensatory or otherwise!,]” but simply authorizes the court to “order the state to share a portion of any fine that the court imposes with the victim or victims of the crime of conviction”
• “ORS 137.101(1) does not itself authorize a court to impose a fine, compensatory or otherwise”
• “ORS 137.101(1) does not itself authorize a court to impose a fine[.]”
• the statute “authorizes the court to order the defendant to pay ‘any portion of the fine’ — that is, the fine that the court imposed as a penalty — to the clerk of the court for payment to the victim or victims”
• reversing and remanding for resentencing under similar circumstances
• exercising discretion to correct a similar error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Garlitz
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-08-23· cited 6×
• State v. Moreno-Hernandez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-02-28· cited 6×
• State v. Nichols
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-10-19· cited 5×
• State v. Ross
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-11-27· cited 2×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-24
• State v. Moore
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-24

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 1,060×
• State v. Fults
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2007-12-13· cited 218×
• State v. Lovelace
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-01-11· cited 14×
• State v. Harrington
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-07-08· cited 14×