Nebraska Supreme Court· 7/27/1990
State v. Moore
Citations
- 458 N.W.2d 232
- 235 Neb. 955
- 1990 Neb. LEXIS 235
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that trial court properly considered defend ant’s lack of remorse in determining appropriate sentence where defendant’s only comment at sentencing was to deny that she had committed crime
- except in the most unusual of cases, for a question of constitutionality to be considered on appeal, it must have been properly raised in the trial court; if not so raised, it will be considered to have been waived
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hastings, Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, Fahrnbruch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court· 1987-08-28· cited 51×
- State v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court· 1988-08-26· cited 43×
- State v. SuttonNebraska Supreme Court· 1989-01-27· cited 35×
- Nelson v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 1959-01-09· cited 22×
- State v. BrandNebraska Supreme Court· 1985-03-01· cited 16×
- State v. JordanNebraska Supreme Court· 1988-08-19· cited 12×
- State v. ShepherdNebraska Supreme Court· 1990-05-18· cited 9×
- Hunt v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 1943-10-29· cited 8×
- State v. ThayerNebraska Supreme Court· 1990-04-06· cited 6×
- State v. KaiserNebraska Supreme Court· 1984-10-26· cited 5×
- State v. CarterNebraska Supreme Court· 1990-02-09· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.