State v. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding clear from statutory framework that trial court has jurisdiction to order restitution payments while defendant incarcerated
• finding meritless defendant’s claim that “the court lacks authority to order restitution payments to commence while [defendant] is incarcerated”
• finding clear from statutory framework that trial court has jurisdiction to order restitution payments 5 while defendant incarcerated
• explaining “restitution is to make the victim whole”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Butler v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1989-05-03· cited 100×
• State v. Iniguez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-04-11· cited 51×
• State v. Stocks
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-06-09· cited 6×
• State v. Patel
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2019-10-22· cited 1×
• State of Arizona v. James Lewandowski
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-03-31

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anders v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
• State v. Hannah
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-09-10· cited 91×
• Dupnik v. MacDougall
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-04-07· cited 30×
• Shenah v. Henderson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1970-11-19· cited 29×
• Redewill v. Superior Court
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1934-02-05· cited 28×
• State v. Currie
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-07-01· cited 9×
• Maricopa County v. State
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-07-16· cited 4×
• State v. Fox
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-12-30· cited 3×