State v. Montoya
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 3429
Syllabus
CRIM.R. 7(D) – AMENDMENT – COMPLAINT – NOTICE – CHILD ENTICEMENT: The trial court did not err in permitting the state to amend the complaint to include a previously omitted subsection of the child enticement statute where the substance of the complaint adequately notified defendant of the charge against him, the amendment did not change the identity of the offense charged, and defendant suffered no prejudice as a result of the amendment.
Judges: Bergeron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. SellardsOhio Supreme Court· 1985-06-05· cited 417×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-10-30· cited 214×
- State v. O'BrienOhio Supreme Court· 1987-05-20· cited 176×
- State v. RomageOhio Supreme Court· 2014-03-06· cited 92×
- State v. RikeOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-30· cited 12×
- State v. WhiteheadOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-13· cited 7×
- Cobb v. OrtizOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-16· cited 3×
- State v. WrightOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-09-19· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.